Compare Lenovo S820 vs HTC Desire 828 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 828 32GB has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 14.0% more
  • Internal Storage of HTC Desire 828 32GB's is 87.0% more than Lenovo S820
  • HTC Desire 828 32GB's got 66.0% more RAM
 
Lenovo S820
HTC Desire 828 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
36 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6589 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 4MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Sense 6.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
139.5 x 69.5 x 8.9 157.7 x 78.9 x 7.9   
Weight
143 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Red White, Dark Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 27GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 2TB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900, CDMA 800   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600, LTE-TDD 1900 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Lenovo S820 vs HTC Desire 828 32GB Specs

Specs
Lenovo S820HTC Desire 828 32GB  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP4MP  

HTC Desire 828 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo S820 with HTC Desire 828 32GB. When you see Lenovo S820 Vs HTC Desire 828 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo S820 stands against HTC Desire 828 32GB and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 828 32GB is Rs. 10,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 10, 2017.
Report an error on this page