Compare Lenovo S90 Sisley vs Samsung Galaxy J5

Feature Comparison

  • Both Lenovo S90 Sisley and Samsung Galaxy J5 have same Screen Size
  • Lenovo S90 Sisley's 32GB Internal Storage is more than Samsung Galaxy J5's 8GB Internal Storage
  • The Samsung Galaxy J5's got 1.5GB RAM, while Lenovo S90 Sisley's RAM is 1GB
 
Lenovo S90 Sisley
Samsung Galaxy J5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
75 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED Super AMOLED   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146 x 71.7 x 6.9 142.1 x 71.8 x 7.9   
Weight
129 grams 146 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray, Platinum Gold, Black, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 1.13W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.8W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4.2GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Lenovo S90 Sisley vs Samsung Galaxy J5 Specs

Specs
Lenovo S90 SisleySamsung Galaxy J5  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy J5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent Performance
  • AMOLED Display offers good contrast
  • Dual SIM with 4G connectivity
The Bad
  • Low, 8GB of Internal Storage
  • Lacks Ambient Light Sensor and Magnetometer
  • 1.5GB of RAM isn't adequate

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo S90 Sisley with Samsung Galaxy J5. When you see Lenovo S90 Sisley Vs Samsung Galaxy J5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo S90 Sisley stands against Samsung Galaxy J5 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J5 is Rs. 10,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page