Compare Lenovo Vibe P1 vs Lava V5

Feature Comparison

  • Both Lenovo Vibe P1 and Lava V5 have same Screen Size
  • The Lenovo Vibe P1's Internal Storage measures in at 32GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • Lava V5's 3GB RAM is more than Lenovo Vibe P1's 2GB RAM
 
Lenovo Vibe P1
Lava V5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
84 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
73 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
152.9 x 75.6 x 9.9 151.9 x 76.7 x 8.3   
Weight
187 grams 153 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Grey -   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal, Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 year manufacturer warranty for Phone and 6 months warranty for in the box accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
23.77GB 11.23GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4900mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
Yes No   

Lenovo Vibe P1 vs Lava V5 Specs

Specs
Lenovo Vibe P1Lava V5  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4900mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Lenovo Vibe P1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Amazing battery life, huge 4900mAh battery
  • Good display with Gorilla Glass Protection
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Dual 4G SIM Support
The Bad
  • Outdoor legibility is poor
  • Heavy to hold
  • Camera performance is hit or miss

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Vibe P1 with Lava V5. When you see Lenovo Vibe P1 Vs Lava V5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Vibe P1 stands against Lava V5 and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Vibe P1 is currently Rs. 15,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page