Compare Lenovo Vibe P1m vs Karbonn Titanium Mach Six

Feature Comparison

  • The Karbonn Titanium Mach Six's Screen Size measures in at 6 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 16.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Lenovo Vibe P1m is the same as Karbonn Titanium Mach Six
  • Both Lenovo Vibe P1m and Karbonn Titanium Mach Six have same RAM
 
Lenovo Vibe P1m
Karbonn Titanium Mach Six
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
79 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64Value For Money
60Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 245 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek -   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735P -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 3.2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Digital image stabilization, White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Touch focus, Digital zoom, Exposure compensations, Geotagging, HDR, Face detection, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141 x 71.8 x 9.3 -   
Weight
148 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Silver, Champagne Gold   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
FD-LTE 800 / 850 / 900 / / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 TD-LTE 2300 -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3900mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
Yes, Quick, v2.0 -   

Lenovo Vibe P1m vs Karbonn Titanium Mach Six Specs

Specs
Lenovo Vibe P1mKarbonn Titanium Mach Six  
Screen Size 5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3900mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP3.2MP  

Lenovo Vibe P1m Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge 3900mAh battery helps it work longer
  • 16GB of Internal storage
  • Dual SIM 4G LTE Connectivity
The Bad
  • Only records in 720p
  • Lags under heavy multitasking

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Vibe P1m with Karbonn Titanium Mach Six. When you see Lenovo Vibe P1m Vs Karbonn Titanium Mach Six comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Vibe P1m stands against Karbonn Titanium Mach Six and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Vibe P1m is currently Rs. 8,490. The prices for both these products were updated January 17, 2018.
Report an error on this page