• Speak now
  • Compare ▾
    • No products to compare!
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • My Account ▾

Compare LG Elite LS696 vs HTC Desire 200

Feature Comparison

  • Both LG Elite LS696 and HTC Desire 200 have same Screen Size
  • HTC Desire 200's got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both LG Elite LS696 and HTC Desire 200 have same RAM
  • Get an email every time the price drops of any of these products
      Set Alert
    Invalid Email ID
    Great! Don't forget to click the confirmation link sent to your email.
 
LG Elite LS696
HTC Desire 200
Add
Samsung Galaxy S Duos S7562
Samsung Galaxy S Duos S7562
Add
Nokia 500
Nokia 500
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
86 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
Value For Money
48Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 3.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 480 x 320 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
164.8 PPI 164.8 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
- -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
800MHz 1GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon S1   
Processor Type
- Single-Core   
RAM
512MB 512MB   
Graphics
- -   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- -   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
LED Flash -   
Video Recording Resolution
- -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash -   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.1 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (2.3) Android (4.1)   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- -   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
120 grams 100 grams   
Dimensions (mm)
117 x 63 x 10 107.7 x 60.8 x 11.9   
Height
- -   
Width
- -   
Thickness
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
1GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
CDMA 800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
CDMA2000 1xEV-DO HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
SIM 1 Bands
- -   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1520mAh 1230mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   
Standby Time
- -   
Talk Time
- -   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   
Loudspeaker
- -   

LG Elite LS696 vs HTC Desire 200 Specs

Specs
LG Elite LS696HTC Desire 200  
Screen Size 3.5 inch3.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 512MB512MB  
Battery Capacity 1520mAh1230mAh  
Front Camera Resolution   
This page helps you compare LG Elite LS696 with HTC Desire 200. When you see LG Elite LS696 Vs HTC Desire 200 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG Elite LS696 stands against HTC Desire 200 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2018.
Report an error on this page