Compare LG F60 D392 vs Samsung Galaxy On Max

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Samsung Galaxy On Max's is 21.0% more than LG F60 D392
  • Samsung Galaxy On Max has 87.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Samsung Galaxy On Max has 4GB RAM, which is 75.0% more
 
LG F60 D392
We Love
Samsung Galaxy On Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
26 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
83 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD PLS   
Pixel Density
207.3 PPI 386 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2.39GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek Helio P25   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 4GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T880 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
BSI Camera -   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) Experience 8.1   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
127.5 x 67.9 x 10.6 156.6 x 78.7 x 8.1   
Weight
130 grams 178 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Gold, Black   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 256GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900   
3G Bands
- B1(2100), B2(1900), B5(850), B8(900   
4G Bands
- B1(2100), B3(1800), B5(850), B8(900), B20(800)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

LG F60 D392 vs Samsung Galaxy On Max Specs

Specs
LG F60 D392Samsung Galaxy On Max  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP13MP  

Samsung Galaxy On Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Front camera is impressive
  • Great low-light rear camera performance
  • Overall performance is decent
  • Samsung Experience UI is user-friendly and looks clean
The Bad
  • Battery life is pretty average, lacks fast charging as well
  • Software includes some bloatware
  • Speaker is positioned right above the power button

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG F60 D392 with Samsung Galaxy On Max. When you see LG F60 D392 Vs Samsung Galaxy On Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG F60 D392 stands against Samsung Galaxy On Max and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy On Max is Rs. 14,900. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page