Compare LG K10 vs Vivo Y55L

Feature Comparison

  • The LG K10's got 5.3 inch Screen Size, while Vivo Y55L's Screen Size is 5.2 inch
  • Both LG K10 and Vivo Y55L have same Internal Storage
  • Both LG K10 and Vivo Y55L have same RAM
 
LG K10
Vivo Y55L
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
96 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
66Value For Money
65Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.3 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
277 PPI 282 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Funtouch OS 2.6   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144.70 x 73.60 x 8.70 147.9 x 72.9 x 7.5   
Weight
142 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Indigo, Gold Gold, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.767W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.224W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.72GB 8.86GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 900   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) D-LTE 2100 / 1800 / 850 / 2300   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2650mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

LG K10 vs Vivo Y55L Specs

Specs
LG K10Vivo Y55L  
Screen Size 5.3 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2650mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

LG K10 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The phone provides adequate grip, so there is no fear of it slipping away
  • Interesting software tweaks added by LG
  • Very good battery life
  • Outdoor legibility is good
The Bad
  • Lacks USB OTG support
  • Modern features like Full HD display and fingerprint scanner are missing
  • Camera shots lack details

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG K10 with Vivo Y55L. When you see LG K10 Vs Vivo Y55L comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG K10 stands against Vivo Y55L and which one you should buy. The best price of LG K10 is currently Rs. 8,440. The lowest price for Vivo Y55L is Rs. 11,299. The prices for both these products were updated February 25, 2018.
Report an error on this page