Compare LG Optimus G Pro E988 vs Xiaomi Mi Max

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Mi Max has 14.0% more Screen Size
  • Xiaomi Mi Max has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Xiaomi Mi Max has 33.0% more RAM
 
LG Optimus G Pro E988
Xiaomi Mi Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
39 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
58Value For Money
68Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6.44 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 342 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 650   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Hexa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 16MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Image Stabilization, Panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.1) MIUI 7   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
139 x 70 x 10 173.1 x 88.3 x 7.5   
Weight
160 grams 203 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Silver, Gold, Dark Gray   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.63W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.84W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 24GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900, CDMA 800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3140mAh 4850mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

LG Optimus G Pro E988 vs Xiaomi Mi Max Specs

Specs
LG Optimus G Pro E988Xiaomi Mi Max  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6.44 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP16MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3140mAh4850mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Xiaomi Mi Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Fast fingerprint scanner
  • Fantastic battery life
  • Acceptable camera quality
The Bad
  • Reported issues with 4K video recording
  • Display visibility reportedly not great outdoors

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG Optimus G Pro E988 with Xiaomi Mi Max. When you see LG Optimus G Pro E988 Vs Xiaomi Mi Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG Optimus G Pro E988 stands against Xiaomi Mi Max and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated January 16, 2018.
Report an error on this page