Compare LYF F1 vs Intex Elyt-e7

Feature Comparison

  • LYF F1's got 5.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of LYF F1 is the same as Intex Elyt-e7
  • RAM of LYF F1 is the same as Intex Elyt-e7
 
LYF F1
Intex Elyt-e7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
53 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
58 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400 PPI 282 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.52GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
155.5 x 77.60 x 7.9 147.9 x 73.2 x 8.7   
Weight
153 grams 156 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold White   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
2 Years 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App -   
Body SAR
0.941W/kg -   
Head SAR
1.22W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 1900/1800/850/900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS WCDMA BAND1(2100)/BAND8(900) MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE-FDD BAND3(1800)/BAND5(850) LTE-TDD BAND40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3200mAh 4020mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

LYF F1 vs Intex Elyt-e7 Specs

Specs
LYF F1Intex Elyt-e7  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3200mAh4020mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

LYF F1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Crisp Full HD display with Gorilla Glass protection
  • Battery life holds up well
  • Decent overall performance
  • 2 years LYF warranty
The Bad
  • Lacks fingerprint scanner
  • Cameras perform just average
  • Not the best build quality

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LYF F1 with Intex Elyt-e7. When you see LYF F1 Vs Intex Elyt-e7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LYF F1 stands against Intex Elyt-e7 and which one you should buy. The best price of LYF F1 is currently Rs. 7,669. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page