Compare LYF Water 4 vs Itel Selfiepro S41

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of LYF Water 4 is the same as Itel Selfiepro S41
  • Internal Storage of LYF Water 4 is the same as Itel Selfiepro S41
  • RAM of Itel Selfiepro S41's is 33.0% more than LYF Water 4
 
LYF Water 4
Itel Selfiepro S41
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
77 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
67 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm -   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Touch Focus, Face Detection, Manual HDR, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142 x 70 x 7.7 144 x 72.4 x 8.3   
Weight
138.5 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
2 Years 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App 1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Cover, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 900 / 1800   
3G Bands
- WCDMA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE B1/3/5/40   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2920mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

LYF Water 4 vs Itel Selfiepro S41 Specs

Specs
LYF Water 4Itel Selfiepro S41  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2920mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

LYF Water 4 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at 294PPI
  • Good rear camera in good lighting conditions
  • Decent overall performance
  • Battery life holds up well
The Bad
  • Runs on dated Android 5.1 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • Misses out on storage expansion

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LYF Water 4 with Itel Selfiepro S41. When you see LYF Water 4 Vs Itel Selfiepro S41 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LYF Water 4 stands against Itel Selfiepro S41 and which one you should buy. The best price of LYF Water 4 is currently Rs. 6,199. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page