Compare LYF Water 5 vs Gionee P7

Feature Comparison

  • Both LYF Water 5 and Gionee P7 have same Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of LYF Water 5 is the same as Gionee P7
  • Both LYF Water 5 and Gionee P7 have same RAM
 
LYF Water 5
Gionee P7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
98 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Asahi Dragontrail Glass -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Face Detection, Manual HDR, Panorama Face Beauty, HDR, Digital zoom, Night Mode, ISO settings, Panorama, Face detection, Professional, White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Time-Lapse, Smart Scene, Text Recognition, GIF, PicNote, Smart Scan, Mood Photo, Self timer, Scene mode, Geo tagging, Touch focus, Exposure compensation,   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Amigo 3.2   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142 x 70.5 x 8 -   
Weight
136 grams 167 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, LATTE GOLD, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
2 Years 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2920mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

LYF Water 5 vs Gionee P7 Specs

Specs
LYF Water 5Gionee P7  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2920mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LYF Water 5 with Gionee P7. When you see LYF Water 5 Vs Gionee P7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LYF Water 5 stands against Gionee P7 and which one you should buy. The best price of LYF Water 5 is currently Rs. 6,490. The lowest price for Gionee P7 is Rs. 7,680. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page