Compare LYF Water 9 vs Panasonic P55 Max

Feature Comparison

  • Both LYF Water 9 and Panasonic P55 Max have same Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Panasonic P55 Max is 50.0% more
  • The Panasonic P55 Max's got 3GB RAM, while LYF Water 9's RAM is 1GB
 
LYF Water 9
Panasonic P55 Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
57 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.53 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geotagging, Autofocus, Panorama, HDR White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Expposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer,   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Quad-LED True Tone Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, IR Blaster   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144 x 70.7 x 7.7 152 x 77.6 x 8.7   
Weight
135 grams 180 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold Matte Black, Champagne Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
2 Years 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App 1 Year on product and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- 1.36W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.637W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 5000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

LYF Water 9 vs Panasonic P55 Max Specs

Specs
LYF Water 9Panasonic P55 Max  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh5000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LYF Water 9 with Panasonic P55 Max. When you see LYF Water 9 Vs Panasonic P55 Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LYF Water 9 stands against Panasonic P55 Max and which one you should buy. The best price of LYF Water 9 is currently Rs. 7,999. The lowest price for Panasonic P55 Max is Rs. 7,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page