Compare Micromax Canvas 2 A110 vs Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro

Feature Comparison

  • Both Micromax Canvas 2 A110 and Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro have same Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro's got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro's 2GB RAM is more than Micromax Canvas 2 A110's 512MB RAM
 
Micromax Canvas 2 A110
Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
23 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD Super AMOLED   
Pixel Density
195.9 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6577 Spreadtrum SC9830   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX531 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
147 x 76.5 x 9.7 142.2 x 71.3 x 8   
Weight
168 grams 139 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Gray, Gold, White, Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.37W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.43W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 41(2500)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Micromax Canvas 2 A110 vs Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas 2 A110Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good Super AMOLED display
  • Comes with NFC
  • Has separate slot for microSD card
  • Supports USB OTG
  • Decent build quality and design
The Bad
  • Camera quality is pretty average
  • Speaker output is not up to the mark
  • Battery backup is less
  • Lacks compass sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas 2 A110 with Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro. When you see Micromax Canvas 2 A110 Vs Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas 2 A110 stands against Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro is Rs. 7,190. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page