Compare Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus vs OnePlus X Onyx

Feature Comparison

  • Both Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus and OnePlus X Onyx have same Screen Size
  • OnePlus X Onyx's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus's 4GB Internal Storage
  • OnePlus X Onyx has 66.0% more RAM
 
Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus
OnePlus X Onyx
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
36 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
51 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
195.9 PPI 441 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6589 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 330   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- f/2.2, Phase Detection Autofocus, 1/3" sensor size, 1.14 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Oxygen OS   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.2 x 72.6 x 11.9 140 x 69 x 6.9   
Weight
168 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Onyx Black   
Build Material
- Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2525mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus vs OnePlus X Onyx Specs

Specs
Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 PlusOnePlus X Onyx  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2525mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP8MP  

OnePlus X Onyx Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking device with premium build quality
  • Comfortable size to hold and use with one hand
  • Excellent screen
  • Largely stock Android with a few useful tweaks like Dark Theme thrown in there
The Bad
  • Updates to the latest Android version can be eccentric
  • The phone gets fairly warm even in day to day tasks
  • The rear camera on the back is well below average
  • The side metal trim is prone to picking up scuffs and scratches
  • No NFC or fingerprint scanner

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus with OnePlus X Onyx. When you see Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus Vs OnePlus X Onyx comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus stands against OnePlus X Onyx and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 Plus is currently Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page