Compare Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120 vs InFocus M808

Feature Comparison

  • InFocus M808's 5.2 inch Screen Size is more than Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120's 5 inch Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the InFocus M808 is 75.0% more
  • The RAM on InFocus M808 is 50.0% more
 
Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120
InFocus M808
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
43 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 157.6 x 77.1 x 7.56   
Weight
156 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray, White Silver, Gold, Leather Black   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.92W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.54W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.61GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2450mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120 vs InFocus M808 Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120InFocus M808  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2450mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

InFocus M808 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Metal Unibody design makes the phone look and feel rich
  • Sharp and vivid display with good pixel density of 424PPI
  • Supports 4G LTE on Indian bands
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.1 Lollipop
  • User Interface is not up to the mark
  • Just about average cameras
  • Mediocre performance, 2GB of RAM is generally maxed out

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120 with InFocus M808. When you see Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120 Vs InFocus M808 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120 stands against InFocus M808 and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas 2 Colours A120 is currently Rs. 7,650. The lowest price for InFocus M808 is Rs. 5,997. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page