Compare Micromax Canvas Doodle A111 vs Motorola Moto G (1st Gen)

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Doodle A111 has 15.0% more Screen Size
  • Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) has 16GB Internal Storage and Micromax Canvas Doodle A111 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) is 50.0% more
 
Micromax Canvas Doodle A111
Motorola Moto G (1st Gen)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
44 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
52 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.3 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
184.8 PPI 326 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 1.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face etection Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.3 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (4.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.1   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
147 x 76.5 x 9.7 129.9 x 65.9 x 11.6   
Weight
168 grams 143 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.06W/kg   
Head SAR
- 1.17W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.22GB 5.1GB   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900, CDMA 800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2070mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Micromax Canvas Doodle A111 vs Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas Doodle A111Motorola Moto G (1st Gen)  
Screen Size 5.3 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2070mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP1.3MP  

Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Near stock Android experience with promise for quick updates in future
  • Compact size, which makes the phone usable with one hand
  • Overall snappy performance
  • Excellent battery life
The Bad
  • The camera performance leaves a lot to be desired
  • Speakers on the phone are not the loudest
  • Lacks LTE
  • No expandable storage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas Doodle A111 with Motorola Moto G (1st Gen). When you see Micromax Canvas Doodle A111 Vs Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas Doodle A111 stands against Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page