Compare Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Micromax Canvas Gold A300 is the same as HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim
  • Internal Storage of Micromax Canvas Gold A300's is 75.0% more than HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim
  • Micromax Canvas Gold A300 has 50.0% more RAM
 
Micromax Canvas Gold A300
HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
84 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
54 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592T MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- White balance settings, Geotagging, ISO settings, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Face detection, HDR, BSI Sensor   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 156.6 x 78.74 x 7.99   
Weight
- 158 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- White, Gray, Blue, Orange   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25GB 4.3GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas Gold A300HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front Stereo Speakers
  • Excellent Camera
  • Dual SIM
The Bad
  • Not that sharp display at just 267PPI
  • Below average processor and just 1GB of RAM
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Way outdated Android version
  • Lacks 4G support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas Gold A300 with HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim. When you see Micromax Canvas Gold A300 Vs HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas Gold A300 stands against HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim is Rs. 16,900. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page