Compare Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 vs Intex Aqua Power HD

Feature Comparison

  • Intex Aqua Power HD has 5 inch Screen Size and Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 has 4.7 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is the same as Intex Aqua Power HD
  • Both Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 and Intex Aqua Power HD have same RAM
 
Micromax Canvas Selfie A255
Intex Aqua Power HD
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
52 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
50 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 MediaTek MT6592M   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (4.4)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146.3 x 67.3 x 9.65 140 x 72.5 x 9   
Weight
138 grams 153 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Angelic White, Mystic Blue White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.14GB 11.9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 vs Intex Aqua Power HD Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas Selfie A255Intex Aqua Power HD  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  

Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front facing flash for low light selfie and selfie lovers
  • Crisp display at 312PPI with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Quite old Android version (4.4 KitKat)
  • Mediocre performance

Intex Aqua Power HD Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display sharpness at 294PPI
  • Great battery life with the 4000mAh unit
The Bad
  • Lacks 4G support
  • Oudated Android version (4.4 KitKat)

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 with Intex Aqua Power HD. When you see Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Vs Intex Aqua Power HD comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 stands against Intex Aqua Power HD and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is currently Rs. 6,299. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Power HD is Rs. 8,229. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page