Compare Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 vs Lava X50

Feature Comparison

  • Lava X50's got 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 is the same as Lava X50
  • The Lava X50 has 2GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313
Lava X50
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
67 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
65 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Mediatek MT6592M MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Auto Focus, Dual-LED Flash Continuous Shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face Detection, White Balance Setting, ISO Setting, Exposure Compensation, Selftimer, Scenemode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 155.00 x 71.80 x 8.80   
Weight
- 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Blue   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 900 / 1800 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 Mhz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 vs Lava X50 Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313Lava X50  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display with 294PPI
  • Decent camera with full HD video recording
  • USB OTG support
The Bad
  • Many bloatwares pre-installed
  • Average battery life
  • Mediocre performance with just 1GB of RAM
  • Lacks 4G connectivity

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 with Lava X50. When you see Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 Vs Lava X50 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 stands against Lava X50 and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 is currently Rs. 6,199. The lowest price for Lava X50 is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page