Compare Micromax Canvas Xpress A99 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray

Feature Comparison

  • The 5 inch Screen Size on the Panasonic Eluga Ray is 10.0% more
  • The Internal Storage on Panasonic Eluga Ray is 50.0% more
  • Panasonic Eluga Ray's got 66.0% more RAM
 
Micromax Canvas Xpress A99
Panasonic Eluga Ray
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
31 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55Value For Money
77Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- HDR, Continuous shooting, Touch focus, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, Face detection, Geotagging, White balance settings, Panorama, Self timer, ISO settings, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, IR Blaster   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132.4 x 64.5 x 8.65 144.4 x 71.6 x 9.7   
Weight
143 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold, Rose Gold, Space Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
0.6W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.68W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, Earphone, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.85GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1950mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Micromax Canvas Xpress A99 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas Xpress A99Panasonic Eluga Ray  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1950mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas Xpress A99 with Panasonic Eluga Ray. When you see Micromax Canvas Xpress A99 Vs Panasonic Eluga Ray comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas Xpress A99 stands against Panasonic Eluga Ray and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas Xpress A99 is currently Rs. 7,399. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Ray is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated January 17, 2018.
Report an error on this page