Compare Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim vs Vivo Y51L

Feature Comparison

  • Both Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim and Vivo Y51L have same Screen Size
  • The Vivo Y51L's Internal Storage measures in at 16GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • Vivo Y51L's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim
Vivo Y51L
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
89 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
57 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 220.29 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.9MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Backside-illuminated Image Sensor, Dynamic Flash, Rich Capture -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 FunTouch OS 2.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141.3 x 72.2 x 8.8 143.80 x 71.70 x 7.52   
Weight
145 grams 157 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White, Black   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.86GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900   
3G Bands
- UMTS 2100 / 850 / 900   
4G Bands
- TD-LTE 2300, FD-LTE 1800   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2350mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim vs Vivo Y51L Specs

Specs
Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual SimVivo Y51L  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2350mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.9MP5MP  

Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Decent display + Gorilla Glass 3 Protection
  • Dual SIM Support
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Laggy Performance
  • Windows App Store lacks apps

Vivo Y51L Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent Processor and RAM combination delivers average performance
The Bad
  • Poor Resolution, Small battery

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim with Vivo Y51L. When you see Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim Vs Vivo Y51L comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim stands against Vivo Y51L and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y51L is Rs. 9,700. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page