Compare Motorola Moto E XT1022 vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Selfie A255's got 8.0% more Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is 75.0% more
  • The Micromax Canvas Selfie A255's got 2GB RAM, while Motorola Moto E XT1022's RAM is 1GB
 
Motorola Moto E XT1022
Micromax Canvas Selfie A255
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
79 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
71Value For Money
66Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.3 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
256.2 PPI 312.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MediaTek MT6592   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 302 Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Panorama, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.1 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
64.8 x 124.8 x 12.3 146.3 x 67.3 x 9.65   
Weight
142 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Angelic White, Mystic Blue   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
1.36W/kg 0.75W/kg   
Head SAR
1.5W/kg 0.82W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.8GB 12.14GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1980mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Motorola Moto E XT1022 vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto E XT1022Micromax Canvas Selfie A255  
Screen Size 4.3 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1980mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP  

Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front facing flash for low light selfie and selfie lovers
  • Crisp display at 312PPI with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Quite old Android version (4.4 KitKat)
  • Mediocre performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto E XT1022 with Micromax Canvas Selfie A255. When you see Motorola Moto E XT1022 Vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto E XT1022 stands against Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is Rs. 6,299. The prices for both these products were updated January 17, 2018.
Report an error on this page