Compare Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen vs Lenovo A6010

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen is the same as Lenovo A6010
  • Internal Storage of Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen is the same as Lenovo A6010
  • Both Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen and Lenovo A6010 have same RAM
 
Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen
Lenovo A6010
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
41 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
54 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop -   
OS Detail
- Android (5.0)   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141.5 x 70.7 x 11 141 x 70 x 8.2   
Weight
149 grams 128 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black, White   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.07W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.91W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 28(700), 40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2470mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen vs Lenovo A6010 Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto G 3rd GenLenovo A6010  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2470mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good HD display and Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Near Stock UI experience and faster Android updates
  • Water Resistant IP67 rating
  • 4G and VoLTE Support
  • Improved 13MP camera
The Bad
  • Average battery capacity at 2470mAh
  • No Full HD display
  • No notification LED
  • No USB cable supplied with the device

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen with Lenovo A6010. When you see Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen Vs Lenovo A6010 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen stands against Lenovo A6010 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo A6010 is Rs. 9,550. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page