Compare Motorola Moto X vs Gionee Elife E5

Feature Comparison

  • The Gionee Elife E5's got 4.8 inch Screen Size, while Motorola Moto X's Screen Size is 4.7 inch
  • Internal Storage of Motorola Moto X is the same as Gionee Elife E5
  • Motorola Moto X's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Motorola Moto X
Gionee Elife E5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
70 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
59 Value For Money Score
54 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 4.8 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED AMOLED   
Pixel Density
312 PPI 306 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 2   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MediaTek MT6589T   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 PowerVR SGX544   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
10MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
1.4 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Continuous shooting, Face Detection, Touch focus, ISO settings, Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Digital zoom, Panorama, White balance settings, Exposure compensation   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.1 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Barometer, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
129.3 x 65.3 x 10.4 137 X 69 X 6.85   
Weight
130 grams 135 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Red, Blue, Walnut, Teak, Turquoise, White White, Black, Yellow   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
0.5W/kg -   
Head SAR
1.39W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2200mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Motorola Moto X vs Gionee Elife E5 Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto XGionee Elife E5  
Screen Size 4.7 inch4.8 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 10MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2200mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto X with Gionee Elife E5. When you see Motorola Moto X Vs Gionee Elife E5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto X stands against Gionee Elife E5 and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto X is currently Rs. 15,622. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page