• hrs
  • mins

Compare Nokia 100 vs Spice Stellar Glamour Mi-436

 
Nokia 100
Spice Stellar Glamour Mi-436
Add
Xolo LT900
Xolo LT900
Add
Karbonn A9 Star
Karbonn A9 Star
Show Only Differences
Add
Xolo LT900
Add
Karbonn A9 Star
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
42VFM Score
52VFM Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
1.8 inch 4 inch   
Screen Resolution
160 x 128 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
IPS LCD IPS LCD   
Pixel Density
114 PPI 233.2 PPI   
Refresh Rate
- -   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
20.37% -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Color
Red, Black, Blue, Pink Black   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
- 1.2GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6572   
Co-Processor
- -   
Number of Cores
- Dual-Core   
RAM
8MB 512MB   
Graphics
- Mali-400   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Number of Rear Cameras
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
No. Of Selfie Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
- 1.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Pop-up Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
- -   
Front Video Resolution
- -   
Slow Motion Video Recording
- -   
Rear Camera Features
- LED Flash   
Front Camera Feature
- -   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Proprietary Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Proprietary Android (4.2)   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
Sensors
- -   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
70 grams 100 grams   
Dimensions (mm)
110 x 45.5 x 14.9 125 x 65.8 x 11.5   
Height
110mm -   
Width
45.5mm -   
Thickness
14.9mm -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8MB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
Loudspeaker
Yes -   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Standard) SIM Mini (Standard) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
USB Connector Type
- Micro USB   
Security
- -   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Connectivity
2G 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
SIM 1 Bands
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz -   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Network     
Battery     
Battery Capacity
850mAh 1400mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   
Charge Time (20% - 100%)
- -   
Standby Time
Up to 600 Hours(2G) -   
Talk Time
Up to 6.7 Hours(2G) -   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   

Nokia 100 vs Spice Stellar Glamour Mi-436 Specs

Specs
Nokia 100Spice Stellar Glamour Mi-436  
Screen Size 1.8 inch4 inch  
Processor MediaTek MT6572  
Internal Storage 8MB4GB  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP  
Front Camera Resolution 1.3MP  
Battery Capacity 850mAh1400mAh  
This page helps you compare Nokia 100 with Spice Stellar Glamour Mi-436. When you see Nokia 100 Vs Spice Stellar Glamour Mi-436 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia 100 stands against Spice Stellar Glamour Mi-436 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated September 22, 2020.
Home Blog About Us FAQs Contact Us Careers Terms of use Privacy Policy Electronics Specifications Feed
Mobile Recharge
100 Million Smiles & Counting

© 2012-2020 Pricebaba™ All rights reserved. All trademarks / logos / brands are the property of their respective owners.

Report an error on this page