- Go Quickly To
- ➔
- Compare Mobiles
- Upcoming Mobiles
- Latest Mobiles
- Best Mobiles
Compare Nokia 101 vs Celkon C409 (Big Battery)
![]() | ![]() | Add Nokia 100 ![]() | Add Lava KKT 42 ![]() |
Highlight: All Features Only Differences |
Rank | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Spec Score | 40 / 100 | 100 / 100 | ||
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration. | ||||
44Value For Money | –Value For Money | |||
Display | ||||
Screen Size | 1.8 inch | 1.8 inch | ||
Screen Resolution | 160 x 128 pixels | 220 x 176 pixels | ||
Screen Type | LCD | LCD | ||
Pixel Density | 113.8 PPI | 156.5 PPI | ||
Screen Protection | - | - | ||
Bezel Less | - | - | ||
Notch | - | - | ||
Screen Features | - | - | ||
Screen to Body Ratio (%) | - | - | ||
Aspect Ratio | - | - | ||
Touch Screen | - | - | ||
Chipset | ||||
Brand | - | - | ||
Processor Speed | - | - | ||
Processor | - | - | ||
Co-Processor | - | - | ||
Processor Type | - | - | ||
RAM | - | - | ||
Graphics | - | - | ||
Architecture | - | - | ||
Camera | ||||
Camera | - | - | ||
Rear Camera Resolution | - | 1.3MP | ||
Dual Rear Camera | - | - | ||
Triple Rear Camera | - | - | ||
Four Rear Camera | - | - | ||
Front Camera Resolution | - | - | ||
Dual Selfie Camera | - | - | ||
Camera Details | - | - | ||
Video Recording Resolution | - | - | ||
Camera Features | - | - | ||
Zoom | - | - | ||
General Specifications | ||||
Operating System | Proprietary | Proprietary | ||
OS Version | - | - | ||
OS Detail | Proprietary | JAVA Proprietary | ||
Custom UI | - | - | ||
OS Upgradable To | - | - | ||
Device Type | Non-Touchscreen | Non-Touchscreen | ||
USB Connector Type | - | Micro USB | ||
Features | FM Radio | FM Radio | ||
Sensors | - | - | ||
IP Rating | - | - | ||
Connectivity | 2G | 2G, Bluetooth | ||
Headphone Jack Type | 3.5mm | 3.5mm | ||
Color | - | - | ||
Build Material | - | - | ||
Device Warranty | 1 Year | - | ||
Warranty Details | - | - | ||
Body SAR | - | - | ||
Head SAR | - | - | ||
In The Box | Device, Charger, User Manual | - | ||
Audio Features | - | - | ||
Weight | 71 grams | 86 grams | ||
Dimensions (mm) | 110 x 45.5 x 14.9 | 110 x 44 x 16 | ||
Height | - | - | ||
Width | - | - | ||
Thickness | - | - | ||
Storage | ||||
Internal Storage | 8MB | - | ||
Approx. User Available Storage | - | - | ||
Card Slot | Yes | Yes | ||
Maximum Card Slot Capacity | 16GB | 8GB | ||
OTG Support | - | - | ||
Communication | ||||
SIM Card Slots | Dual | Dual | ||
Network Type | GSM | GSM + CDMA | ||
SIM Card Type | Mini (Normal) SIM | Mini (Normal) SIM | ||
SIM 1 Details | 2G, Mini SIM | - | ||
SIM 2 Details | 2G, Mini SIM | - | ||
Dual 4G VoLTE | - | - | ||
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM) | - | - | ||
2G Bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | - | ||
3G Bands | - | - | ||
4G Bands | - | - | ||
SIM 1 Bands | - | - | ||
SIM 2 Bands | - | - | ||
SIM 3 Bands | - | - | ||
HDMI | - | - | ||
Wi-Fi | - | - | ||
Wi-Fi Features | - | - | ||
Battery | ||||
Battery Capacity | 1020mAh | 1800mAh | ||
Battery Type | Lithium-ion (Li-ion) | Lithium-ion (Li-ion) | ||
Removable Battery | Yes | Yes | ||
Wireless Charging | - | - | ||
Fast Charging | - | - | ||
Standby Time | - | - | ||
Talk Time | - | - | ||
Multimedia | ||||
Music | - | - | ||
Video Player | - | - | ||
Loudspeaker | - | - |
Nokia 101 vs Celkon C409 (Big Battery) Specs
Specs | Nokia 101 | Celkon C409 (Big Battery) | ||
Screen Size | 1.8 inch | 1.8 inch | ||
Rear Camera Resolution | 1.3MP | |||
RAM | ||||
Battery Capacity | 1020mAh | 1800mAh | ||
Front Camera Resolution |
This page helps you compare Nokia 101 with Celkon C409 (Big Battery). When you see Nokia 101 Vs Celkon C409 (Big Battery) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia 101 stands against Celkon C409 (Big Battery) and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated February 22, 2019.
Most Commonly Compared to
Top Mobile Phone Comparisons In India (2019)
New Mobile Phones
© 2012-2019 Pricebaba™ All rights reserved. All trademarks / logos / brands are the property of their respective owners.

Report an error on this page