• hrs
  • mins

Compare Nokia 215 Dual Sim vs Micromax X900

 
Nokia 215 Dual Sim
Micromax X900
Add
Karbonn K85
Karbonn K85
Add
Vox Kick K4
Vox Kick K4
Show Only Differences
Add
Karbonn K85
Add
Vox Kick K4
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61VFM Score
58VFM Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.4 inch 2.8 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 480 x 320 pixels   
Screen Type
IPS LCD IPS LCD   
Pixel Density
166.7 PPI 206 PPI   
Refresh Rate
- -   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
- -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Color
Black, Green, White Blue   
Chipset     
Brand
- -   
Processor Speed
- -   
Processor
- -   
Co-Processor
- -   
Number of Cores
- -   
RAM
8MB -   
Graphics
- -   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Number of Rear Cameras
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
0.3MP 0.3MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
No. Of Selfie Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
- -   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Pop-up Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
- -   
Front Video Resolution
- -   
Slow Motion Video Recording
- -   
Rear Camera Features
- -   
Front Camera Feature
- -   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Proprietary Proprietary   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Proprietary -   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
Sensors
- -   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
79 grams -   
Dimensions (mm)
116 x 50 x 12.9 145 x 81 x 53   
Height
- -   
Width
- -   
Thickness
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
- -   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
Loudspeaker
- -   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Standard) SIM Mini (Standard) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Security
- -   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 2G, Bluetooth   
SIM 1 Bands
- -   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Network     
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1100mAh 1000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- No   
Charge Time (20% - 100%)
- -   
Standby Time
- -   
Talk Time
- -   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   

Nokia 215 Dual Sim vs Micromax X900 Specs

Specs
Nokia 215 Dual SimMicromax X900  
Screen Size 2.4 inch2.8 inch  
Processor   
Internal Storage   
Rear Camera Resolution 0.3MP0.3MP  
Front Camera Resolution   
Battery Capacity 1100mAh1000mAh  

Micromax X900 Pros & Cons

Pros
  • It is a touchscreen device
  • It has a removable battery
  • It has a rear camera
Cons
  • Does not offer support for 3G
  • Its battery capacity may prove insufficient to get you through a day
This page helps you compare Nokia 215 Dual Sim with Micromax X900. When you see Nokia 215 Dual Sim Vs Micromax X900 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia 215 Dual Sim stands against Micromax X900 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated September 22, 2020.
Home Blog About Us FAQs Contact Us Careers Terms of use Privacy Policy Electronics Specifications Feed
Mobile Recharge
100 Million Smiles & Counting

© 2012-2020 Pricebaba™ All rights reserved. All trademarks / logos / brands are the property of their respective owners.

Report an error on this page