Compare Nokia 216 Dual SIM vs Nokia 150 Dual Sim

 
Nokia 216 Dual SIM
Nokia 150 Dual Sim
Add
Nokia 130 Dual Sim
Nokia 130 Dual Sim
Add
Micromax X930
Micromax X930
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47VFM Score
53VFM Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.4 inch 2.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 320 x 240 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
167 PPI 167 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
- -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- -   
Processor Speed
- -   
Processor
- -   
Co-Processor
- -   
Processor Type
- -   
RAM
- -   
Graphics
- -   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
0.3MP 0.3MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP -   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
- -   
Slow Motion Video Recording
- -   
Camera Features
Flash -   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Proprietary Proprietary   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
- -   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Non-Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Connectivity
2G, Bluetooth 2G, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gray, Blue White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
83 grams 81 grams   
Dimensions (mm)
118.0×50.02×13.5 118.00 x 50.20 x 13.50   
Height
- -   
Width
- -   
Thickness
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
- -   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
- -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Mini SIM 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM 2G, Micro SIM   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 900 / 1800 MHz   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
SIM 1 Bands
- -   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1020mAh 1020mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
- -   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   
Standby Time
- -   
Talk Time
- -   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   
Loudspeaker
- -   

Nokia 216 Dual SIM vs Nokia 150 Dual Sim Specs

Specs
Nokia 216 Dual SIMNokia 150 Dual Sim  
Screen Size 2.4 inch2.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 0.3MP0.3MP  
RAM   
Battery Capacity 1020mAh1020mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP  

Nokia 216 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • It offers dual SIM support
  • It is lightweight
  • It is offered in three colour variants
The Bad
  • Does not offer support for 3G
  • The plastic build makes the phone feel cheap

Nokia 150 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Back camera with flash
  • Torchlight support
  • 25-day battery standby
  • Dual sim support
  • Scratch-free design
The Bad
  • No front camera
  • Lack of 4G and 3G support
  • Low-resolution display
This page helps you compare Nokia 216 Dual SIM with Nokia 150 Dual Sim. When you see Nokia 216 Dual SIM Vs Nokia 150 Dual Sim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia 216 Dual SIM stands against Nokia 150 Dual Sim and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia 216 Dual SIM is currently Rs. 1,950. The lowest price for Nokia 150 Dual Sim is Rs. 1,500. The prices for both these products were updated July 23, 2019.
Report an error on this page