Compare Nokia 515 vs Xolo Black 3GB

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Xolo Black 3GB is 56.0% more
  • Xolo Black 3GB has 98.0% more Internal Storage
  • Xolo Black 3GB's 3GB RAM is more than Nokia 515's 64MB RAM
 
Nokia 515
Xolo Black 3GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
10 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
166.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
- 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
- Octa-Core   
RAM
64MB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- Yes, 2MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- HDR, Red eye, Geo tagging removal, Panorama capture, Zero Shutter Lag, Supports Ubifocus, ChromaFlash Optizoom   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Proprietary Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Series 40 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
114 x 48 x 11 155.5 x 76.6 x 73   
Weight
101 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.27W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.13W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
256MB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.08GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1200mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No Yes, Qualcomm Quick Charge 1.0   

Nokia 515 vs Xolo Black 3GB Specs

Specs
Nokia 515Xolo Black 3GB  
Screen Size 2.4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 64MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1200mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Xolo Black 3GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality and design
  • Decent rear and front cameras, front camera has an LED Flash as well
  • Good multitasking experience, thanks to 3GB RAM
  • Sharp display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Sluggish User Interface at times
  • Not a great device for gaming or performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Hybrid SIM slot, limits storage to 16GB if the device is used with two SIMs

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia 515 with Xolo Black 3GB. When you see Nokia 515 Vs Xolo Black 3GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia 515 stands against Xolo Black 3GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia 515 is currently Rs. 10,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page