Compare Nokia Asha 501 vs Coolpad Mega 3

Feature Comparison

  • Coolpad Mega 3 has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Nokia Asha 501 has 3 inch Screen Size
  • Coolpad Mega 3 has 16GB Internal Storage, whereas Nokia Asha 501 has 128MB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Coolpad Mega 3 is 96.0% more
 
Nokia Asha 501
Coolpad Mega 3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
58 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
133.3 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
- 1.2GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
64MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
2048x1536 Pixels Face detection, Continuous shooting, ISO settings, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Geotagging, White balance settings, Self timer, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Nokia Asha Software Platform Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Nokia Asha Software Platform 1.0 CoolUI 8.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
99.2 x 58 x 12.1 154.4 x 76.8 x 8.35   
Weight
98 grams 170 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Gold, Moondust Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
128MB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Triple   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band (2100), (1800), (850), (2600), (800), (2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1200mAh 3050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia Asha 501 vs Coolpad Mega 3 Specs

Specs
Nokia Asha 501Coolpad Mega 3  
Screen Size 3 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP8MP  
RAM 64MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1200mAh3050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP  

Coolpad Mega 3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Triple SIM support
  • Supports Reliance Jio network (VoLTE enabled)
The Bad
  • Mediocre overall performance
  • Average battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Asha 501 with Coolpad Mega 3. When you see Nokia Asha 501 Vs Coolpad Mega 3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Asha 501 stands against Coolpad Mega 3 and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Asha 501 is currently Rs. 5,999. The lowest price for Coolpad Mega 3 is Rs. 7,299. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page