Compare Nokia C5 vs Gionee Marathon M3

Feature Comparison

  • The Gionee Marathon M3's Screen Size measures in at 5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 56.0% more
  • The Gionee Marathon M3's got 8GB Internal Storage, while Nokia C5's Internal Storage is 270MB
  • The Gionee Marathon M3's RAM measures in at 1GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 75.0% more
 
Nokia C5
Gionee Marathon M3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
53 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.2 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
181.8 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
600MHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
256MB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-450 MP   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Fixed Focus Face Beauty, Panorama(Horizontal & Vertical), Eraser, Face Detection, Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, 99 Snaps In One Click, Gesture Shot, Smile Shot   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Symbian Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Symbian S60 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
112.3 x 46 x 12.3 144.5 x 71.45 x 10.4   
Weight
95 grams 180 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- White, Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase   
Body SAR
- 0.73W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.29W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
270MB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB 5.51GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1050mAh 5000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
- No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia C5 vs Gionee Marathon M3 Specs

Specs
Nokia C5Gionee Marathon M3  
Screen Size 2.2 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP8MP  
RAM 256MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1050mAh5000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP2MP  

Gionee Marathon M3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Battery life is impressive
The Bad
  • Average Camera performance
  • Feels bulky to hold
  • 1GB of RAM isn't enough

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia C5 with Gionee Marathon M3. When you see Nokia C5 Vs Gionee Marathon M3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia C5 stands against Gionee Marathon M3 and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia C5 is currently Rs. 6,039. The lowest price for Gionee Marathon M3 is Rs. 10,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page