Compare Nokia Lumia 520 vs HTC Desire 816

Feature Comparison

  • The 5.5 inch Screen Size on the HTC Desire 816 is 27.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Nokia Lumia 520 is the same as HTC Desire 816
  • HTC Desire 816's RAM is 66.0% more
 
Nokia Lumia 520
HTC Desire 816
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
1/4'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging. Geotagging, Touch Focus, Continuous shooting, Face Detection, ISO settings, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, White balance settings   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 HTC Sense UI 6.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
119.9 x 64 x 9.9 156.6 x 78.7 x 8   
Weight
124 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Yellow, White, Red White, Gray, Orange   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4.2GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1430mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia Lumia 520 vs HTC Desire 816 Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 520HTC Desire 816  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 1430mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

HTC Desire 816 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impressive sound output
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Good battery backup
The Bad
  • Glossy back attracts smudges and fingerprints
  • Supports nano SIM cards only

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 520 with HTC Desire 816. When you see Nokia Lumia 520 Vs HTC Desire 816 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 520 stands against HTC Desire 816 and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Lumia 520 is currently Rs. 8,000. The lowest price for HTC Desire 816 is Rs. 19,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page