Compare Nokia Lumia 625 vs LYF Water 8

Feature Comparison

  • LYF Water 8's Screen Size is 5.0% more
  • LYF Water 8 has 16GB Internal Storage and Nokia Lumia 625 has 8GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of LYF Water 8's is 83.0% more than Nokia Lumia 625
 
Nokia Lumia 625
LYF Water 8
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
198.5 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus Geotagging, Continuous Shooting, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus, Face Detection, White balance setting, ISO setting, Exposure Compensation, Self-timer, Scene Mode, High Dynamic Range mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133.3 x 72.3 x 9.2 142 x 70.5 x 7.0   
Weight
159 grams 122 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Orange, White, Black Black, White   
Build Material
- Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9.24GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia Lumia 625 vs LYF Water 8 Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 625LYF Water 8  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Nokia Lumia 625 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Supports LTE
  • Good battery life
  • Attractive phone as it is available in plenty of colour options
The Bad
  • The rear camera has a substantial shutter lag
  • Lack of magnetometer results in no compass
  • Low resolution poor display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 625 with LYF Water 8. When you see Nokia Lumia 625 Vs LYF Water 8 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 625 stands against LYF Water 8 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for LYF Water 8 is Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page