Compare Nokia Lumia 625 vs Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Nokia Lumia 625 is 4.0% more
  • Both Nokia Lumia 625 and Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G have same Internal Storage
  • The Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G has 1GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
Nokia Lumia 625
Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
58 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
64 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
198.5 PPI 244.8 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 302   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus Geo-tagging, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 480p Video Recording   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 Android (5.0)   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.1   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133.3 x 72.3 x 9.2 129.9 x 66.8 x 12.3   
Weight
159 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Orange, White, Black Black, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4.61GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2390mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia Lumia 625 vs Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 625Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G  
Screen Size 4.7 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2390mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP0.3MP  

Nokia Lumia 625 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Supports LTE
  • Good battery life
  • Attractive phone as it is available in plenty of colour options
The Bad
  • The rear camera has a substantial shutter lag
  • Lack of magnetometer results in no compass
  • Low resolution poor display

Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good battery life
  • Good build quality
  • Dual SIM support
The Bad
  • Camera is disappointing
  • Low screen resolution ruins the experience
  • No 4G connectivity

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 625 with Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G. When you see Nokia Lumia 625 Vs Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 625 stands against Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 3G is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page