Compare Nokia Lumia 625 vs Vivo Y51L

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo Y51L has 5.0% more Screen Size
  • Vivo Y51L has 16GB Internal Storage and Nokia Lumia 625 has 8GB Internal Storage
  • The Vivo Y51L's got 2GB RAM, while Nokia Lumia 625's RAM is 512MB
 
Nokia Lumia 625
Vivo Y51L
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
57 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
198.5 PPI 220.29 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 FunTouch OS 2.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133.3 x 72.3 x 9.2 143.80 x 71.70 x 7.52   
Weight
159 grams 157 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Orange, White, Black White, Black   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.86GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 UMTS 2100 / 850 / 900   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800) TD-LTE 2300, FD-LTE 1800   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2350mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia Lumia 625 vs Vivo Y51L Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 625Vivo Y51L  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2350mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Nokia Lumia 625 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Supports LTE
  • Good battery life
  • Attractive phone as it is available in plenty of colour options
The Bad
  • The rear camera has a substantial shutter lag
  • Lack of magnetometer results in no compass
  • Low resolution poor display

Vivo Y51L Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent Processor and RAM combination delivers average performance
The Bad
  • Poor Resolution, Small battery

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 625 with Vivo Y51L. When you see Nokia Lumia 625 Vs Vivo Y51L comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 625 stands against Vivo Y51L and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y51L is Rs. 9,700. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page