Compare Nokia Lumia 630 vs Vivo X3S

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo X3S's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Nokia Lumia 630's 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Vivo X3S is 50.0% more
  • Vivo X3S has 50.0% more RAM
 
Nokia Lumia 630
Vivo X3S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
46 Value For Money Score
52 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6592   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 Android (4.2)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
129.5 x 66.7 x 9.2 143.3 x 71.03 x 5.95   
Weight
134 grams 153 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- -   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.05W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.46W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.3MB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1830mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

Nokia Lumia 630 vs Vivo X3S Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 630Vivo X3S  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1830mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Vivo X3S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent display sharpness with HD resolution
  • Full HD video recording
The Bad
  • Lacks 4G LTE support
  • Below average performance
  • Outdated Android version (Android Jelly Bean 4.2)

Nokia Lumia 630 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Colourful shells on the device makes the phone attractive
  • These shells can be replaced by the user
  • Exceptional battery life
  • One of the first phones to come with Windows 8.1 out of the box
The Bad
  • No Dual SIM
  • Lacks a front facing camera
  • No flash for the rear camera
  • The display has a poor resolution making the screen look grainy

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 630 with Vivo X3S. When you see Nokia Lumia 630 Vs Vivo X3S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 630 stands against Vivo X3S and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Lumia 630 is currently Rs. 9,950. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page