Compare Nokia N8 vs Oppo Yoyo R2001

Feature Comparison

  • Oppo Yoyo R2001 has 4.7 inch Screen Size and Nokia N8 has 3.5 inch Screen Size
  • Nokia N8 has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Oppo Yoyo R2001's RAM is 75.0% more
 
Nokia N8
Oppo Yoyo R2001
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
52 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
640 x 360 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
209.8 PPI 234.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Broadcom MediaTek   
Processor Speed
680MHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6582M   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
256MB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
12MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, Xenon, 1/1.83'' Sensor Size, ND Filter, Geo-Tagging, Face Detection Geotagging, Face detection, Touch focus, Panorama, HRD   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Symbian Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Symbian BELLE Android (4.2)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
113.5 x 59.1 x 12.9 138.5 x 69.5 x 9.2   
Weight
135 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on phone and 6 month on Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Cover   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 2GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1200mAh 1900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia N8 vs Oppo Yoyo R2001 Specs

Specs
Nokia N8Oppo Yoyo R2001  
Screen Size 3.5 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 12MP5MP  
RAM 256MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1200mAh1900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP2MP  

Nokia N8 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The camera is in a class of its own, when it comes to stills and videos both
  • Beautiful Aluminum shell gives the phone premium look and feel
  • AMOLED screen ensures good colour reproduction
  • The screen has Gorilla Glass protection
The Bad
  • The UI on Symbian is still fairly laggy
  • The portrait orientation lacks option to type in QWERTY keyboard
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia N8 with Oppo Yoyo R2001. When you see Nokia N8 Vs Oppo Yoyo R2001 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia N8 stands against Oppo Yoyo R2001 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page