Compare Oppo F1 vs iberry Auxus 4X

Feature Comparison

  • iberry Auxus 4X has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • iberry Auxus 4X has 32GB Internal Storage and Oppo F1 has 16GB Internal Storage
  • The iberry Auxus 4X has 4GB RAM, which is 25.0% more
 
Oppo F1
iberry Auxus 4X
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
60 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 400.53 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
2.5D Curved Glass -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Digital image stabilization, HDR, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation. self timer, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
ColorOS 2.1 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio -   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143.50 x 71 x 7.25 148.40 x 74.20 x 7.30   
Weight
134 grams 143 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Rose Gold Black   
Build Material
Metal -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.687W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.16W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Cover -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
2G Bands
GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Oppo F1 vs iberry Auxus 4X Specs

Specs
Oppo F1iberry Auxus 4X  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Oppo F1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Selfie camera is quite good, if you click a lot of selfies
  • Metal Body Construction, Great Build
The Bad
  • No NFC Support
  • Smaller battery may be a problem for power users

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo F1 with iberry Auxus 4X. When you see Oppo F1 Vs iberry Auxus 4X comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo F1 stands against iberry Auxus 4X and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo F1 is currently Rs. 14,550. The lowest price for iberry Auxus 4X is Rs. 15,990. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page