Compare Oppo Find 7a vs Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG's is 8.0% more than Oppo Find 7a
  • Both Oppo Find 7a and Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Oppo Find 7a is the same as Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG
 
Oppo Find 7a
Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
67 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
67Value For Money
60Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 244.8 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Intel   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Intel Atom Z2580   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 PowerVR SGX544 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR, ISO settings, Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.3 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (4.3) -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.0 Android 5.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
152.6 x 75 x 9.2 166.9 x 84.3 x 9.9   
Weight
170 grams 196 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- White, Black, Red, Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.221W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.744W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, Cover Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 800(band 20) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
Yes, VOOC Flash Charge No   

Oppo Find 7a vs Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG Specs

Specs
Oppo Find 7aAsus Zenfone 6 A600CG  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Find 7a with Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG. When you see Oppo Find 7a Vs Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Find 7a stands against Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG is Rs. 8,290. The prices for both these products were updated February 24, 2018.
Report an error on this page