Compare Oppo Find 7a vs Vivo Y28

Feature Comparison

  • Oppo Find 7a has 14.0% more Screen Size
  • Oppo Find 7a's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Vivo Y28's 8GB Internal Storage
  • Oppo Find 7a's got 50.0% more RAM
 
Oppo Find 7a
Vivo Y28
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
48 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
53 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 234.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR, ISO settings, Face Beauty, Panorama mode   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (4.3) Android (4.2)   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, GPS FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
152.6 x 75 x 9.2 137.37 x 68.57 x 9.78   
Weight
170 grams 156 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- White, Blue   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.221W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.744W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, Cover Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB 4.33GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 800(band 20) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
Yes, VOOC Flash Charge No   

Oppo Find 7a vs Vivo Y28 Specs

Specs
Oppo Find 7aVivo Y28  
Screen Size 5.5 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Vivo Y28 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Some neat software tricks like Smart Wake and Super Screenshot
  • User removable battery and the back panel
The Bad
  • No Dual SIM
  • No 4G LTE connectivity
  • Lack of HD display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Find 7a with Vivo Y28. When you see Oppo Find 7a Vs Vivo Y28 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Find 7a stands against Vivo Y28 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y28 is Rs. 10,990. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page