Compare Oppo Joy Plus vs Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 has 27.0% more Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 is 75.0% more
  • The Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469's got 2GB RAM, while Oppo Joy Plus's RAM is 1GB
 
Oppo Joy Plus
Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, Touch focus, Face detection, Geo-Tagging -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) Android (5.1)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
124 x 63 x 9.9 164 x 94 x 42   
Weight
125 grams 100 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.55GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE 800 / 1800 / 2600 TD-LTE 2300   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1700mAh 2820mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo Joy Plus vs Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 Specs

Specs
Oppo Joy PlusMicromax Canvas Play 4G Q469  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1700mAh2820mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Full HD video recording capability
  • Decent battery life
The Bad
  • Average display sharpness
  • Mediocre performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Joy Plus with Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469. When you see Oppo Joy Plus Vs Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Joy Plus stands against Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page