Compare Oppo Joy R1001 vs Xolo Q1000s Plus

Feature Comparison

  • The Xolo Q1000s Plus's Screen Size measures in at 5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 20.0% more
  • Xolo Q1000s Plus has 32GB Internal Storage, whereas Oppo Joy R1001 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • Xolo Q1000s Plus's got 75.0% more RAM
 
Oppo Joy R1001
Xolo Q1000s Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
69 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 440.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572W MediaTek MT6589T   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 PowerVR SGX544   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Face Detection, Continuous shooting, Geo tagging, Touch focus, Face detection & Burst Shoot BSI 2 Sensor, Scene Detection & Tuning, Low Light Enhancement, Geo Tagging, Vertical & Horizontal Panorama Capture HDR, Face Recognition   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Android (4.2)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Taptic Home Button, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
124 x 63 x 9.9 147 x 72.1 x 7.98   
Weight
125 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase -   
Body SAR
- 0.56W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.58W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.3GB -   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 900 / 1800   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 MHz HSDPA 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1700mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo Joy R1001 vs Xolo Q1000s Plus Specs

Specs
Oppo Joy R1001Xolo Q1000s Plus  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1700mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Joy R1001 with Xolo Q1000s Plus. When you see Oppo Joy R1001 Vs Xolo Q1000s Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Joy R1001 stands against Xolo Q1000s Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Joy R1001 is currently Rs. 12,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page