Compare Oppo Mirror 3 vs Lenovo K3 Note Music

Feature Comparison

  • The 5.5 inch Screen Size on the Lenovo K3 Note Music is 14.0% more
  • Lenovo K3 Note Music's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • The 2GB RAM on the Lenovo K3 Note Music is 50.0% more
 
Oppo Mirror 3
Lenovo K3 Note Music
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
88 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6752   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Mali-T760   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geotagging, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Panorama, ISO settings, Digital zoom, HDR, Continuous shooting, Self timer, HDR, Touch focus, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
ColorOS 2.0i -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
137.6 x 68.8 x 8.95 152.6 x 76 x 7.9   
Weight
126 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Yellow, Pearl White, Onyx Black   
Build Material
Plastic Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
3.91GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 7(2600) MHz -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Oppo Mirror 3 vs Lenovo K3 Note Music Specs

Specs
Oppo Mirror 3Lenovo K3 Note Music  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo K3 Note Music Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent displat sharpness at 401PPI
  • Decent battery life to last through the day
  • Android Marshmallow update available
The Bad
  • Average performance, lags during heavy tasks
  • Heating issues while performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Mideocre camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Mirror 3 with Lenovo K3 Note Music. When you see Oppo Mirror 3 Vs Lenovo K3 Note Music comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Mirror 3 stands against Lenovo K3 Note Music and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo K3 Note Music is Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page