Compare Oppo Mirror 3 vs Vivo Y53

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Vivo Y53's is 5.0% more than Oppo Mirror 3
  • Vivo Y53's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Oppo Mirror 3's 8GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of Vivo Y53's is 50.0% more than Oppo Mirror 3
 
Oppo Mirror 3
Vivo Y53
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
59 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 220.29 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 308   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geotagging, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Panorama, ISO settings, Digital zoom, HDR, Continuous shooting, Self timer, HDR, Touch focus, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode Normal, Face Beauty, Panorama, HDR, Night, PPT, Pro, Voice Capture, Touch Capture, Palm Capture, and Timer   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
ColorOS 2.0i Funtouch OS 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
137.6 x 68.8 x 8.95 144.2 × 71.4 × 7.64   
Weight
126 grams 137 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Crown Gold, Space Gray, Matte Black   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
3.91GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 7(2600) MHz LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo Mirror 3 vs Vivo Y53 Specs

Specs
Oppo Mirror 3Vivo Y53  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Mirror 3 with Vivo Y53. When you see Oppo Mirror 3 Vs Vivo Y53 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Mirror 3 stands against Vivo Y53 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y53 is Rs. 8,449. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page