Compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs LYF Water 11

Feature Comparison

  • LYF Water 11 has 10.0% more Screen Size
  • LYF Water 11 has 16GB Internal Storage and Oppo Neo 3 R831K has 4GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of LYF Water 11's is 66.0% more than Oppo Neo 3 R831K
 
Oppo Neo 3 R831K
LYF Water 11
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
43 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.1 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572W MediaTek MT6735A   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Rear: f/2.4, Front: f/2.8, Digital zoom, Geotagging Auto-Focus, Multi Angle View Mode, Auto-Scene Detection, Face Detection, Video Snapshot, Smile Shot and Gesture Capture   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
ColorOS -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132 x 65.8 x 9.2 141 x 70 x 7.3   
Weight
128.5 grams 134.5 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.51GB 12GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs LYF Water 11 Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 3 R831KLYF Water 11  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Oppo Neo 3 R831K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Battery life lasts a full day
  • Comfortable device to hold due to curved back
  • Dual SIM card slot available as well as a Micro SD slot for memory expansion
The Bad
  • Dated Android OS and poor overall performance
  • No HD display
  • Poor camera quality

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K with LYF Water 11. When you see Oppo Neo 3 R831K Vs LYF Water 11 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 3 R831K stands against LYF Water 11 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for LYF Water 11 is Rs. 6,849. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page