Compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs Yu Yureka Note

Feature Comparison

  • The Yu Yureka Note's got 6 inch Screen Size, while Oppo Neo 3 R831K's Screen Size is 4.5 inch
  • Yu Yureka Note has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Yu Yureka Note's 3GB RAM is more than Oppo Neo 3 R831K's 1GB RAM
 
Oppo Neo 3 R831K
Yu Yureka Note
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.1 PPI 367.15 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572W MediaTek MT6753T   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Rear: f/2.4, Front: f/2.8, Digital zoom, Geotagging Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
ColorOS -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132 x 65.8 x 9.2 -   
Weight
128.5 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.51GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No Yes, Fast Charging   

Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs Yu Yureka Note Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 3 R831KYu Yureka Note  
Screen Size 4.5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Oppo Neo 3 R831K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Battery life lasts a full day
  • Comfortable device to hold due to curved back
  • Dual SIM card slot available as well as a Micro SD slot for memory expansion
The Bad
  • Dated Android OS and poor overall performance
  • No HD display
  • Poor camera quality

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K with Yu Yureka Note. When you see Oppo Neo 3 R831K Vs Yu Yureka Note comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 3 R831K stands against Yu Yureka Note and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Yu Yureka Note is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page