Compare Oppo Neo 5 (2014) vs Intex Cloud Style 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Intex Cloud Style 4G's 12.7 inch Screen Size is more than Oppo Neo 5 (2014)'s 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Intex Cloud Style 4G has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Oppo Neo 5 (2014) is the same as Intex Cloud Style 4G
 
Oppo Neo 5 (2014)
Intex Cloud Style 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 12.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
218 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Spreadtrum SC7731   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Face detection, Geo-tagging, Panorama, HDR, Digital zoom, Touch focus, Scene mode F.No(rear) : 2.4, lens(rear) : 4P, 2.8 Aperture, Lens : 3P, Module. 4:3 Aspect Ratio, 2592 * 1944 Pixel Size (Micron), VCM Yes, Module Yes   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android 4.3 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132 x 65.8 x 9.2 145 x 73 x 8.8   
Weight
132 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Champagne, Dark Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 -   
Body SAR
1.238W/kg 1.447W/kg   
Head SAR
0.546W/kg 0.262W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual, Cover, Screen Guard Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 MHz WCDMA 900/2100MHz   
4G Bands
LTE 11800 / 2100 MHZ / 2600 MHZ (FDD Band 3,Band 5 TDD Bands :Band 40)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo Neo 5 (2014) vs Intex Cloud Style 4G Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 5 (2014)Intex Cloud Style 4G  
Screen Size 4.5 inch12.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 5 (2014) with Intex Cloud Style 4G. When you see Oppo Neo 5 (2014) Vs Intex Cloud Style 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 5 (2014) stands against Intex Cloud Style 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Neo 5 (2014) is currently Rs. 7,389. The lowest price for Intex Cloud Style 4G is Rs. 4,699. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page