Compare Oppo Neo 5 (2015) vs Xolo Cube 5.0

Feature Comparison

  • The Xolo Cube 5.0 has 5 inch Screen Size, which is 10.0% more
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Oppo Neo 5 (2015) is 50.0% more
  • RAM of Oppo Neo 5 (2015) is the same as Xolo Cube 5.0
 
Oppo Neo 5 (2015)
Xolo Cube 5.0
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
76 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
66 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6582M   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, Sony IMX 179 Sensor, HDR, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Touch focus, self timer, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Exposure compensation, Geotagging, White balance settings, ISO settings, Panorama Face Detection, Geo Tagging   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (5.0)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
131.9 x 65.5 x 8.0 143 x 71 x 6.9   
Weight
135 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.19W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.79W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, Cover Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 MHz HSDPA 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo Neo 5 (2015) vs Xolo Cube 5.0 Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 5 (2015)Xolo Cube 5.0  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Oppo Neo 5 (2015) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Full HD video recording capability
  • Dual SIM support
The Bad
  • Lacks 4G LTE support
  • Average performing processor
  • Poor battery capacity
  • Below average display resolution

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 5 (2015) with Xolo Cube 5.0. When you see Oppo Neo 5 (2015) Vs Xolo Cube 5.0 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 5 (2015) stands against Xolo Cube 5.0 and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Neo 5 (2015) is currently Rs. 8,000. The lowest price for Xolo Cube 5.0 is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page