Compare Oppo R1 R829T vs Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG

Feature Comparison

  • Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG has 6 inch Screen Size and Oppo R1 R829T has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Oppo R1 R829T is the same as Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG
  • Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG's 2GB RAM is more than Oppo R1 R829T's 1GB RAM
 
Oppo R1 R829T
Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
60 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 244.8 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Intel   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Intel Atom Z2580   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 PowerVR SGX544 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Face detection, panorama, HDR, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Scene mode Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.3 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.7 x 70.4 x 7.1 166.9 x 84.3 x 9.9   
Weight
141 grams 196 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White White, Black, Red, Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Unibody Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Cover Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 MHz HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2410mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo R1 R829T vs Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG Specs

Specs
Oppo R1 R829TAsus Zenfone 6 A600CG  
Screen Size 5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2410mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo R1 R829T with Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG. When you see Oppo R1 R829T Vs Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo R1 R829T stands against Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo R1 R829T is currently Rs. 11,490. The lowest price for Asus Zenfone 6 A600CG is Rs. 8,290. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page