Compare Oppo R1 R829T vs Lava X81

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Oppo R1 R829T is the same as Lava X81
  • Both Oppo R1 R829T and Lava X81 have same Internal Storage
  • Lava X81's RAM is 66.0% more
 
Oppo R1 R829T
Lava X81
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
70 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Face detection, panorama, HDR, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Scene mode White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.7 x 70.4 x 7.1 142.6 x 73.4 x 8.4   
Weight
141 grams 141 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Space Gray, Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Unibody Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Cover Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 900/1800 MHz   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 MHz 900, 2100MHz HSPA+ (3G)   
4G Bands
- LTE 800, 1800 MHz FDD, 2300 MHz TDD,Data: Cat 4, DL   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2410mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo R1 R829T vs Lava X81 Specs

Specs
Oppo R1 R829TLava X81  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2410mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo R1 R829T with Lava X81. When you see Oppo R1 R829T Vs Lava X81 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo R1 R829T stands against Lava X81 and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo R1 R829T is currently Rs. 11,990. The lowest price for Lava X81 is Rs. 7,799. The prices for both these products were updated December 9, 2017.
Report an error on this page